|
|
|
ÃÖÀºÈñ ( Choi Eun-Hee ) - Çѱ¹¼º¼´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
±èÁøÈñ ( Kim Jin-Hee ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³º´¿ø °í¹Ì¼÷ ( Ko Mi-Suk ) - Çѱ¹¼º¼´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкΠ±ÇÀº¿Á ( Kwon Eun-Ok ) - ¼¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø °£È£ºÎ ÀåÀμø ( Jang In-Sun ) - Çѱ¹¼º¼´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was done to examine predictive validity of Critical Care Non-verbal Pain Scale (CNPS) and
develop criteria for pain assessment using CNPS with critically ill patients who have communication problems.
Methods: Data were collected from intensive care units at three major general hospitals in Seoul and Kyunggi province. During each observation, a nurse assessed pain severity using CNPS ratings (range 0-9) at four treatment stages: at rest, during central catheter dressing change (nonpainful procedure), position change and suctioning (routine painful procedures). Patients also assessed their pain using a self-report 4-point VRS-4.
Results: There were significant differences between the four treatment stages except between "at rest" and "nonpainful procedure". Strong correlations were found between CNPS and VRS-4 for "at rest" (r=.552, p<.001), central catheter dressing change (r=.505, p<.001), position change (r=.709, p<.001), and suctioning (r=.662, p<.001). ROC curve analysis of CNPS based on 3 point on VRS-4 showed the cutoff point was 3 for CNPS, the starting point for pain management with 73% sensitivity, 92.2% specificity, 73% positive predictive value, and 92.8% negative predictive value.
Conclusion: Results indicate that CNPS is a valid tool for measuring pain in critically ill patients with ommunication problems and 3 point should be the standardized pain treatment point.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
ÁßÁõÁúȯ, ÅëÁõ ÃøÁ¤, ¹Î°¨µµ, ƯÀ̵µ, °î¼±ÇϸéÀû
Critically ill, Pain measurement, Sensitivity, Specificity, Area under curve
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|